<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photoxpress Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.photoxpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.photoxpress.com</link>
	<description>News about PhotoXpress.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhotoXpress.com makes bold move for market share by Ethelyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoxpress.com/2010/03/photoxpress-com-makes-bold-move-for-market-share/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoxpress.com/?p=19#comment-857</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I appreciate the pricing model. However, I have serious objections to the &#8220;family-friendly&#8221; descriptor. Hardly a search goes by that doesn&#8217;t somehow end up with pictures of women wearing hardly anything, striking poses that are hardly &#8220;family-friendly.&#8221; My first impression of this site is that for the reduced price of admission, you just have to deal with the smut. Now to find out that we call it &#8220;family-friendly&#8221;? Yeah, right.&lt;/i&gt;
+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I appreciate the pricing model. However, I have serious objections to the &#8220;family-friendly&#8221; descriptor. Hardly a search goes by that doesn&#8217;t somehow end up with pictures of women wearing hardly anything, striking poses that are hardly &#8220;family-friendly.&#8221; My first impression of this site is that for the reduced price of admission, you just have to deal with the smut. Now to find out that we call it &#8220;family-friendly&#8221;? Yeah, right.</i><br />
+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhotoXpress Changes Microstock Game by peph</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoxpress.com/2011/06/photoxpress-changes-microstock-game/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>peph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoxpress.com/?p=58#comment-838</guid>
		<description>PhotoXpress is down for maintenance

Our website is down for maintenance, but we will be back shortly. Thank you for your patience. Please feel free to browse our blog which is still available.

?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhotoXpress is down for maintenance</p>
<p>Our website is down for maintenance, but we will be back shortly. Thank you for your patience. Please feel free to browse our blog which is still available.</p>
<p>?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PhotoXpress.com makes bold move for market share by Carl Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blog.photoxpress.com/2010/03/photoxpress-com-makes-bold-move-for-market-share/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.photoxpress.com/?p=19#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the pricing model. However, I have serious objections to the &quot;family-friendly&quot; descriptor. Hardly a search goes by that doesn&#039;t somehow end up with pictures of women wearing hardly anything, striking poses that are hardly &quot;family-friendly.&quot; My first impression of this site is that for the reduced price of admission, you just have to deal with the smut. Now to find out that we call it &quot;family-friendly&quot;? Yeah, right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the pricing model. However, I have serious objections to the &#8220;family-friendly&#8221; descriptor. Hardly a search goes by that doesn&#8217;t somehow end up with pictures of women wearing hardly anything, striking poses that are hardly &#8220;family-friendly.&#8221; My first impression of this site is that for the reduced price of admission, you just have to deal with the smut. Now to find out that we call it &#8220;family-friendly&#8221;? Yeah, right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

